The President of the Supreme Court's Office and Chairman of the Federal Judiciary Minister Guillermo Ortiz Mayagoitia not interested in fighting in the Federal Judiciary the causes of the commission of crime and antisocial as ordered by the third paragraph of Article Three of the ACT ESTABLISHING THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF COORDINATION OF THE NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY nor interested in further study on PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME to create the best conditions development of childhood and adolescence in Mexico, as mandated by international treaty called THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD .
Quite simply, the Minister Guillermo Ortiz Mayagoitia did not know of this writing despite being the President of the Federal Judiciary Council and despite that the Federal Judicial Institute, the body responsible for training its judges, it also depends on it.
For this reason, CAN NOT TRUST THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY, AND A BOARD OF THE JUDICIARY.
This is the statement that that minister would not answer Ortiz Mayagoitia or notify your answer.
"CUAUTITLAN IZCALLI STATE OF MEXICO, FEBRUARY
A TWENTY-TWO THOUSAND SEVEN OF
Minister Guillermo Ortiz Mayagoitia
PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE NATION
AND CHAIRMAN OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT MEXICO
FEDERAL
P Resentful
RIVERA JUAN MIGUEL MOLINA, by my own right and in my capacity as legal representative of my youngest son BRUNO MIGUEL MARIN RIVERA ten years of age, before you, I appear to expose respectfully: That
follow-up to my peaceful and respectful request that you make through my letter dated 13 February, two thousand seven, received the same day with the folio number 006931 by the Parties Officer Arturo Gutierrez Cruz, and having been quoted by his secretary DIAZ ALBERTO DIAZ particular for this day February 21, two thousand seven to fourteen hours and zero minutes in the offices of the based on this Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, through him, he sent this new brief in which he reported the following:
I have almost eight years of not living with my children because the District Judges and Magistrates Circuit refer here have missed PRINCIPLES of excellence, objectivity, impartiality, professionalism and independence GOVERNING THE JUDICIAL CAREER as ordered by the seventh paragraph of Article 100 of our Constitution, which has the consequence that appellate judges in family dispute met my family in the 1169/2003 play-based number Tlalnepantla State of Mexico and the Family Court ADELAIDE DIAZ NATIVIDAD CASTREJÓN based Cuautitlan Izcalli Mexico state who met in the first instance my file 0190/2003, have never met or have been enforced Articles 4396-4402 of the Civil Code of the State of Mexico, the current day of June of two thousand and 2 to 16 January two thousand and seven, which in turn has resulted in the Municipal System for Integral Family Development (DIF) in Cuautitlan Izcalli Mexico State has never counted up the true today with Experts in domestic violence or the programs to prevent and overcome the causes of abuse and all kinds of violence within the family to pay the aggressor, the victim and the family group medical, psychological and social as mandated by Article 4402 Civil Code of the State of Mexico.
1 .- The judges then members of the Third Collegiate Court for Administrative Matters for the Second Circuit based in Naucalpan Mexico State Rosalez JESUS \u200b\u200bMANUEL SUAREZ, HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ ANGELINA and Bachelor WORLD HUGO VALENZUELA, secretary Acting Judge assigned by resolution of April 24 of two thousand three unfounded resolved that my disagreement No. 02/2003 filed against the order for failure to comply nineteenth day of February two thousand and three issued by then Judge Seventh District of the same circuit and same venue WILLY EARL VEGA RAMIREZ rendered in indirect amparo 01187/2002-I number, allowing the Second Section of the Upper Chamber Administrative Disputes Tribunal of Mexico, with headquarters in Tlalnepantla State of Mexico in turn allow the State System for Integral Family Development of Mexico State as ordered by violating Articles 128 and 133 of our MAGNA CARTA, with WELFARE LAW OF THE STATE OF MEXICO, with Article 3 of the LAW CREATING A MUNICIPAL SYSTEMS FOR INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT FAMILY, with LAW (FEDERAL) FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS and the Code of Administrative Procedure STATE OF MEXICO, why it was not possible for my children or me, not even for my ex-wife, the services of psychology, social work or legal person requesting to rebuild communication with my ex-wife destroyed on at least two trials of divorce and therefore, until today no has been possible to jointly exercise parental authority in respect of our children, nor my children and myself living pursues our rights decreed by enforceable of March 30th two thousand and one issued by Judge Family First Cuautitlan Mexico State in the case 887/2000.
Although I was granted the protection, however the aforementioned circuit judges allowed the State of Mexico DIF violate these laws.
2 .- Due to the resolution of the nineteenth of February two thousand and three issued by the District Judge EARL VEGA RAMIREZ WILLY the thirteenth day of March two thousand and three decided to take advantage of articles 4396-4402 of the Civil Code and 2,134 to 2,140 articles of the Code of Civil Procedure, both the State of Mexico and denounced my former wife for committing psychological damage my kids asking two benefits: 1 .- To my ex-wife ordered to be submitted along with our children and me to the DIF of Cuautitlan Izcalli Estado de Mexico for services of Psychology, Social Work and Health to rebuild communication destroyed by two earlier divorce proceedings, just to exercise parental authority jointly. Y 2 .- To prevent my ex-wife who continue to cause psychological harm to our youngest children lose custody voluntarily granted.
Because of this shift corresponded to meet the family dispute then Second Family Judge Cuautitlan Izcalli Mexico State ADELAIDE NATIVIDAD DIAZ CASTREJON, quien no soportó las tentaciones a que lo expusieron mis ex cuñados abogados.
Los Magistrados integrantes del Tercer Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Segundo Circuito con sede en Toluca Estado de México FELIPE ALFREDO FUENTES BARRERA, ANGEL RAUL SOLÍS SOLÍS y JUAN CARLOS ORTEGA CASTRO, negaron a mis menores hijos y a mí el amparo y protección de la Justicia de la Unión en el amparo directo número 042/2004 a pesar de haber reconocido en su sentencia que la controversia familiar número 190/2003 del Juzgado Segundo Familiar de Cuautitlan Izcalli Estado de México debió tramitarse como lo ordenan los artículos 2.134 a 2.140 del Código de Procedimientos Mexico State Civil and despite having found not handled well, it was sufficient to review the case at first instance to verify that that family court has never held a single hearing evidence and arguments as mandated by Article 2136 but several. Also check the cars was enough to see that this family court did not comply with Articles 4396 to 4402 of the Civil Code.
These judges is also why my children and I have not received the services of Social Work and Medicine by DIF despite the raid on my ex-wife nor psychology services for truly expert in domestic violence.
These judges to forget I said that one hundred forty-six the pages of my request for defense. I asked them to review the orders of these precepts and that this knowledge will review the case at first instance to verify their violation, it was my minor children, who had a total substitution of the complaint in their favor, they saw how he broke the whole procedure to make assumptions expert opinions against me, that based on them had ordered the suspension of our right to existence and hidden psychological damage caused to my children by my ex-wife, that we were denying Social Work services and Medical accepted by my ex-wife that during the entire year of 2002 I was litigating against Mexico State DIF to provide us the same services, I had decided not to exercise my right to live together because my ex-wife had poisoned my children against me, it was useless We denied the amparo.
3 .- Because the Family Court then Second Cuautitlan Izcalli Mexico State DIAZ NATIVIDAD ADELAIDE Castrejon, not withstand the temptations to which they exposed my ex-law lawyers, it was dedicated to make agreements with the malicious and negligent purpose of obstructing the administration of justice and hinder my studying forensic psychologists practicing my children and my ex-wife allowed for unassisted up to four times to no measures of constraint perceived by effective despite what they order 2,134 and 1,318 articles of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of Mexico, which are worded as follows:
"Help to
experts
Section 1318 .- The Court shall take the necessary measures to give the experts all the facilities that allow them to cast their opinion. "
" Sufficiency of evidence and final hearing
Section 2136 .- In the absence of conciliation and procedural exceptions are resolved, the judge the date and time to have verified an evidentiary hearing and arguments within period of ten days. "
Since the day 14 August, two thousand three, the family court continued to violate the times, terms, deadlines and procedures ordered by Articles 4396-4402 of the Civil Code and articles 2134 2,140 of the Code of Civil Procedure, both the State of Mexico and still did not resolve the family dispute began on March 13, two thousand three, this against an administrative complaint with the Judicial Council of the State of Mexico. Neither the Comptroller nor the then President of the Council ex Judge Villicaña ESTRADA ABEL, gave way, why on September 10 of two thousand three starts indirect amparo 1064/2003-II-B number that because of shift corresponded to the Eighth District Judge Letter B of the Second Circuit based in Naucalpan Mexico State ESCAMILLA SILVIA through interview.
Although responsible Comptroller and the then President of the Council ex Villicaña ESTRADA ABEL Judge, presented a report justified false and forged documents, the district judge by its resolution of 15 December of two thousand three sobreselló because my request for defense after the filing of the petition for relief was acted on a false complaint. I filed the appeal, which corresponded Judges then meet members of the Third Collegiate Court for Administrative Matters for the Second Circuit based in Naucalpan Mexico State Rosalez JESUS \u200b\u200bMANUEL SUAREZ, ANGELINA HERNANDEZ SUAREZ FLORES HERNÁNDEZ and CLEMENTINA who, through their decision in the case 83 / 2004 confirmed the dismissal.
If You Lord President of the Supreme Court's Office and Chairman of the Federal Judiciary Council reviews all proceedings in this case 1064/2003-II-B will not find the deal that should make those responsible without doubt refer to my letter of complaint filed on August 14, two thousand three. You will find two different receipts and that the evidence did perderizas accompanied my letter of complaint. Rather you will find crooked and inconsistent arguments of these judges by whom had the responsibility to give answer my request. Did not store or save the eighth article of our Constitution even though we demonstrated the existence of the five acts claimed.
These federal judges allowed the family court ADELAIDE DIAZ NATIVIDAD CASTREJÓN further examination of our family dispute agreements dictating 190/2003 malicious and negligent obstructing the administration of justice, as handed down its decision of 10 October the two thousand three. It was futile against the administrative complaint on August 14, two thousand three, which NEVER AND EVEN TODAY, never gave way.
4 .- She brought the indirect amparo 732/2004-III number before the Fourth District Court of Protection Matters and Federal Civil Trial Second Circuit based in Toluca, Mexico State Attorney CARLOS ALBERTO SOSA LÓPEZ, Secretary attached Acting District Judge for the Judicial Council of the State of Mexico informed me without referring to a resolution never to my administrative complaint filed on August 14 of two thousand three administrative appeal declared inadmissible my dissatisfaction. I argued District Judge of the Judicial Council never allowed me to ratify or not the complaint as mandated by Article 118 of the first fraction of ORGANIC LAW OF THE JUDICIARY OF THE STATE OF MEXICO, and that ratification is a procedural requirement ie, if the complaint is not ratified should be discarded out of hand, not giving way, and yet this Council responsible filed a complaint that never ratified, ie, whether the false claim or complaint filed indeed, never ratified and yet, was released from all liability relative to said second judge, when I insist, in the absence of ratification should be discarded because this provision is 118 read:
"Article 118 .- The procedure for administrative liability against public servants of the judiciary, should be initiated:
I. Challenge, which if ratified, which shall be in writing, under oath and be signed by the complainant, including their home.
are entitled to lodge a complaint for administrative offenses:
a). The parties to the proceedings.
b). The Public Ministry, in the processes involved.
c). The victim, in criminal proceedings.
If any of the above requirements, the complaint will be dismissed outright.
II. On the report issued on the occasion of visits made to the halls and courts or for acts arising from the exercise of the function of servers. "
Despite this, the district judge denied an injunction to me, why she filed the appeal, which corresponded to meet the then magistrates of the First Appellate Court on Administrative Matters for the Second Circuit based in Toluca Mexico State ANGELINA HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ, CARLOS CONTRERAS REYES DARIO MONDRAGON Y SALVADOR REYES, who through the decision rendered in the appeal that decision confirmed 402/2004 contested ie definitely robbed me of my right to ratify or not the complaint as resolved at that administrative disciplinary proceedings.
5 .- For Third Magistrates Court on Civil Matters for the Second Circuit based in Toluca Mexico State ALFREDO FUENTES FELIPE BARRERA, ANGEL SOLIS and SOLIS RAUL ORTEGA JUAN CARLOS CASTRO, because of shift accounted know judicial review my number 50/2005, lodged by me on Wednesday 2 March of two thousand and five I asked was excused from continuing review of this resource because of its behavior in solving the direct amparo number 42/2004. These judges located on the third floor of the building at the Doctor Nicholas Street San Juan No. 104, Colonia Cuauhtemoc Ex Rancho Toluca in Mexico State, take turns instead of the impediment to the Second Collegiate Court in Civil Matters of the same circuit and at the same venue located on the second floor immediately below them, the nearest and the same subject, it turns to the Administrative Office of Courts Common Parties on Civil Matters, who turned over the bar to the judges of the First Court Collegiate Civil of the same circuit and the same building located to the first floor composed of Judges VAZQUEZ RICARDO ROMERO, JOSE MARIA MENDOZA MENDOZA AND ENRIQUE PEREZ GONZALEZ, recording my handicap as number 02/2005.
All these judges violated the following contradiction of thesis:
"IMPAIRMENT OF JUDGES OF SPECIALIZED Circuit Court of matter. To determine who must resolve to address the continuum FACTOR OF EXPERTISE AND VICINITY .- In accordance with Article 37, section VII, of the Organic Law of the Judiciary of the Federation, the Circuit Courts have jurisdiction to hear impediments in any matter arising between the judges of the Circuit Court, corresponding to their knowledge Circuit Court closer. Thus, in determining the jurisdiction of such cases in a circuit where there at the same venue several specialized by subject judge courts, should be addressed to the proximity factor, which includes not only the scope of territorial jurisdiction, but the matter that are specialized courts, so that the turn of the impediments is made taking into consideration also the specialization of the Circuit Court, to take cognizance of these matters that a court whose specialty is the same as what is considered prevented in order to observe the celerity that such matters require.
P. / J.
76/2000 Contradiction
13/96.-Entre the thesis supported by the Second Collegiate Court for Administrative Matters of the Third Circuit and the First Appellate Court on Criminal Matters of the circuito.-June 5, 2000.-Unanimity of ten votos.-Away Guillermo I. Ortiz Mayagoitia.-Rapporteur: José de Jesus Gudino Pelayo.-Secretary: M. Guadalupe Ortiz Blanco.
The Full Court, in its closed meeting held today under way July 11, approved, with the number 76/2000 antecede. jurisprudential thesis, Mexico, Federal District, 11 July, two thousand.
Instance: Plenum. Source: Judicial Weekly of the Federation and its Gazette, Novena Epoca. Volume XII, August 2000. P. 39. Thesis Court. Judges
RICARDO ROMERO VAZQUEZ, JOSE MARIA PEREZ MENDOZA MENDOZA AND ENRIQUE GONZALEZ , committed the offense against the administration of justice provided in the first fraction of Article 225 of the Federal Penal Code and punishable in terms of the penultimate paragraph , which reads as follows:
"Section 225 .- They are crimes against the administration of justice committed by public servants as follows: I.
- Knowledge of business for which they have a legal impediment or abstain from hearing the they are concerned, without legal impediment to it;
Anyone committing
crimes set forth in Sections I, II, III, VII, VIII, IX, XX, XXIV, XXV and XXVI shall be sanctioned by imprisonment of three to eight years and five hundred to fifteen hundred days' wages. "
The Judges RICARDO ROMERO VAZQUEZ, JOSE MARIA PEREZ MENDOZA MENDOZA AND ENRIQUE GONZALEZ , also incurred the grounds of administrative responsibility under the second section of Article 131 of the ORGANIC LAW OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY, which reads as following:
"Article 131. Be causes of action for civil servants of the Judiciary of the Federation
II. Interfere unduly jurisdictional issues that fall within other organs of the Judiciary of the Federation "
Despite all this, these judges insisted on keeping the knowledge of the impediment and its resolution 02/2005 of 7 April, two thousand five, unfounded and fined me.
6 .- To the Magistrates of the First Collegiate Administrative Tribunal for the Second Circuit then based in Toluca Mexico State ANGELINA HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ, CARLOS CONTRERAS REYES DARIO MONDRAGON Y SALVADOR REYES , because of shift accounted know incidents of disagreement my numbers 01/2005, 02/2005 04/2005 and my resources and revision numbers 70/2005 and 94/2005, I asked was excused from continuing to hear of these issues given their behavior in resolving the appeal number 402/2004. These judges then located on the eighth floor of the building at the Doctor Nicholas Street San Juan No. 104, Colonia Cuauhtemoc Ex Rancho Toluca in Mexico State, take turns instead of the impediment to the Second Collegiate Court for Administrative Matters of the same circuit located in Naucalpan Estado de Mexico, down to the Third Court of the same stuff the same property as ordered by the aforementioned contradiction thesis referred to above, it turns directly to the Fourth Court Civil Collegiate located on the seventh floor of that building in the city of Toluca in Mexico State composed of Judges strong pound JOSE CHAVEZ, JOSE MARTINEZ AND JORGE MARIO GUZMÁN REBOLLEDO PARDO, recording my impediments to 01/2005 numbers , 02/2005, 03/2005, 05/2005 and 06/2005 solving them unfounded.
Although the city of Toluca in Mexico State, but no Mixed Courts specialized by subject, the judges strong pound JOSE CHAVEZ, JOSE MARTINEZ MARIO GUZMAN AND JORGE PARDO REBOLLEDO, specializing in civil matters wanted to know of these impediments administrative matters, therefore, also incurred both in that crime committed against the administration of justice in the said grounds of administrative responsibility described above.
7 .- President of the Supreme Court's Office and Chairman of the Federal Judiciary Council, Minister Guillermo Ortiz MAYAGOI-TIA, all these facts were duly reported to this Council and recorded in the administrative complaint numbers 313 / 2004, 201/2005, 223/2005 and 502/2005, but no sanctions were imposed nor complied with the eleventh fraction of Article 81 of the ORGANIC LAW OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY , which mandates that :
"Section 81. The powers of the Federal Judiciary Council:
XI. Suspended from his duties at the circuit magistrates and district judges shall appear involved in the commission of a crime, and submit a complaint or lawsuit against them in cases where appropriate; "
To safeguard the principles of excellence, objectivity, impartiality, professionalism and independence GOVERNING THE JUDICIAL CAREER as ordered by the seventh paragraph of Article 100 of our Constitution and the best interest of MY MINOR CHILD as ordered by Articles 3 and 41 of the international treaty called THE CONVENTION CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, and given the autonomy procedures of political, criminal and administrative civil servants, as mandated by the penultimate paragraph of Article 109 of our Constitution, on 26 October of two thousand and four presented a criminal complaint with the Attorney General's Office against Third Magistrates Court on Civil Matters for the Second Circuit based in Toluca Mexico State ALFREDO FUENTES FELIPE BARRERA, ANGEL SOLIS and SOLIS RAUL ORTEGA JUAN CARLOS CASTRO for acts committed by solving the direct under number 42/2004, the November 15, two thousand four presents another complaint against the judges then members Third Collegiate Court for Administrative Matters for the Second Circuit based in Naucalpan Mexico State Rosalez JESUS \u200b\u200bMANUEL SUAREZ, ANGELINA HERNANDEZ SUAREZ FLORES HERNÁNDEZ and CLEMENTINA , contrary to the Eighth District Judge Letter B of the Second Circuit based in Naucalpan Mexico State through interview SILVIA ESCAMILLA, against the Magistrates of the First Collegiate Administrative Tribunal for the Second Circuit then based in Toluca Mexico State ANGELINA HERNANDEZ HERNANDEZ, DARIO REYES CARLOS CONTRERAS AND SAVIOR REYES MONDRAGON and against the Fourth District Court of Amparo and Trial Matters Second Circuit Federal Civil based in Toluca, Mexico State, Graduate CARLOS ALBERTO SOSA LÓPEZ , Acting Secretary assigned district judge, to allow them all to the President and Council of the Judiciary of the State of Mexico and refrain from issuing the agreement must notify me fall to my application lodged on 14 August, two thousand three, and keep me ratify or not the complaint that gave rise to the disciplinary procedure DCI/D/0072/2003.
Both complaints were registered with the number of preliminary PGR/MEX/TOL/I/233/2004 but the Attorney General's Office has no interest in entering or criminal action, therefore started against the number 871/2006-III amparo before the First District Court of Protection Matters and Civil Judgments-based Federal State of Mexico Toluca EARL WILLY RAMIREZ VEGA who by order of September 27 the two thousand six gave us shelter and protection of the Justice of the Union to the effect that in a period not exceeding forty days, is resolved. Against this resolution, the charge filed three appeals which were admitted and registered as 141/2006, 142/2006 and 143/2006 for the Fourth Collegiate Criminal Tribunal for the Second Circuit based in the city of Toluca Integrated Mexico State of Judges DARIO REYES CARLOS CONTRERAS, REYNALDO REYES MANUEL REYES ARTURO ROSAS AND JORGE JIMÉNEZ.
Because Chief Justice CARLOS CONTRERAS REYES DARIO declined to hear no such application for review from the dictates of their cars admisorios of 16 November, two thousand six, the third of January two thousand and seven asked his fellow Court gave effect to the seventh and eighth fractions of Article 131 of the ORGANIC LAW OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY to inform the Federal Judicial Council conduct its President and the case is that I do not even have notified their agreement.
Given the delay in the resolution of these appeals and the failure to excuse the presiding judge, on 29 January, two thousand and seven had against the magistrates of this Court an administrative complaint, which I have no information despite that I appeared on February 8 of this 2007 with the Director of Citizen of the General Office of the President of the Federal Judiciary Council Dir Mr. Eduardo Aguilar Chiu, requesting information about my complaint.
Anyway, Mr. President that the judges of the Fourth Court members remain unresolved appeals referred to extending the term of forty days until today to more than three months.
8 .- As the former Chairman of the Judiciary of the State of Mexico Villicaña ESTRADA ABEL NEVER acted on my administrative complaint filed on August 14, two thousand and three against the family court referral, the fifteenth of October two thousand and three filed a criminal complaint against this judge familiar with the Attorney General of the State of Mexico, because he had to make malicious and negligent agreements contrary to the orders of Articles 4396-4402 of the Civil Code and 2,134 to 2,140 articles of the Code of Civil Procedure, both the State of Mexico, during the processing of our family dispute number 190/2003.
first as Chairman of the Judiciary of the State of Mexico and now as Attorney General, including the State of Mexico, Mr. Abel Villicana Estrada continues to protect the family court ADELAIDE DIAZ NATIVIDAD Castrejon, because through its order of June 19 of two thousand and six gave no exercise of the prosecution in the preliminary number TOL/DR/I/1242/2003.
against this decision brought the indirect amparo 926/2006-II number which corresponded to meet the First District Court in Matter of Protection and Civil Judgments-based Federal State of Mexico Toluca EARL WILLY RAMIREZ VEGA who complete resolution of swelling by the ninth of November two thousand and six denied us shelter and protection of the Justice of the European Union but have found the violation to the aforementioned provisions, claiming that my youngest son has no right to the substitution of the complaint and supplementing the complaint in favor of the defendant does not exist.
interposed against this decision the appeal which has been acknowledged by the President of the First Collegiate Criminal Tribunal for the Second Circuit based in Toluca Mexico State designated as rapporteur Judge RUBEN SANCHEZ ARTURO VALENCIA by order of January 9 the two thousand and seven citándonos to hear sentence.
Because of my concern about the conduct of judges at issue, on Monday 19 February of two thousand and seven asked to speak to the judge rapporteur, which was given me, to want to explain the behavior of all these judges and why This injunction against the Attorney General of the State of Mexico, regardless of my letter of grievances, was upset with me telling me not to allow its private offend fellow judges, when my purpose is not to offend but to explain what occurred which became tense, calling his two secretaries to be present as witnesses, reiterating me that I have almost eight years without live with my children because the family court and these judges did not meet or did meet the 4,396 to 4,402 articles of the Civil Code and articles from 2134 to 2140 of the Code of Civil Procedure, both the State of Mexico, during the pendency of our dispute Family number 190/2003. Now I have a fear that because of this friction, the reporting judge violates the law and convince their fellow judges to confirm the contested decision, leaving the crime unpunished, because in the end and after repeated attempts to shut me up and leave their private in a threatening manner I said "WHO ARE YOU ALREADY"
9 .- Finally the President of the Supreme Court's Office and Chairman of the Federal Judiciary Council, Minister Guillermo Ortiz Mayagoitia respectfully shown that all the judges referred to herein have participated to CONVERT TO MY CHILDREN ON FATHER'S ORPHANS LIVE FOR NOTHING IS THE FORCE OF LAW TO THE DELIVERY OF NOTHING HAS SERVED ME MY STEP BY THE UNIVERSITY OF LAW, THE LAW THAT NOTHING IS KNOWN FOR WRITING IN SPANISH, THIS IS THE REAL DIF HAS NO EXPERTS intrafada-MILIAR VIOLENCE OR THE PROGRAMS OR with the skills needed to prevent and treat The causes of such violence, for all this, you are right when it states that the Supreme Court's Office has not public confidence as he acknowledged in his first speech as chairman and as a spread in the media.
To unlock this denial of justice and preserving PRINCIPLES of excellence, objectivity, impartiality, professionalism and independence GOVERNING THE JUDICIAL CAREER as ordered by the seventh paragraph of Article 100 of our Constitution and the best interests UNDER MY SON as ordered by Articles 3 and 41 of the international treaty called CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, concrete and respectfully ask the following: 1 .- Study
records referred here to find expressed herein and therefore is fulfilled eleventh fraction of Article 81 of the ORGANIC LAW OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY, which mandates that:
"Article 81. The powers of the Federal Judiciary Council:
XI. Suspended from his duties at the circuit magistrates and district judges shall appear involved in the commission of a crime, and submit a complaint or lawsuit against them in cases where appropriate; "
2 .- Provide refresher training to District Judges and Circuit Judges in the field of PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME and under the Convention for the Protection Rights of the Child that you and the Minister Olga Sánchez Cordero signed with UNICEF in September of two thousand three, as the fact that until today I was not having responded to my request submitted on 24 January, two thousand and seven, which in copy enclosed with this letter, I do not presume that these courses were taught and which therefore also lacks experts in this field.
also accompany this written a single copy of the second edition of the book "SAP PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME HANDLED BY CHILDREN TO HATE THE OTHER SPOUSE" author JOSE MANUEL AGUILAR, of English publisher Almuzara.
If judges know this disease, my children and I would not be in this situation.
PROTEST TO YOU ALL MY RESPECT FOR MOLINA RIVERA JUAN MIGUEL
"
HERE TO MY WRITING.
With the advent of the Minister Ortiz Mayagoitia the Presidency of the Council of the Federal Judiciary, I thought it would be very different to when this body was chaired by the Minister Mariano Azuela Guitron, but today I realized that remains the same therefore I said to the Minister Azuela Guitron the September 13, two thousand six, I reiterate today what the Minister Ortìz Mayagoitia:
"Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 3:06:19
-0500 Subject:
MEXICO .- Mariano Azuela Guitron MINISTER PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE NATION AND THE COUNCIL OF THE JUDICIARY, YOU may contradict Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador when he says "THIS COUNCIL IS ONE OF THE JUDICIARY TO PROTECT WHITE COLLAR CRIMINALS ARE YOUR OWN JUDGES OF CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT JUDGES."
NATIONAL PUBLIC OPINION AND INTERNATIONAL, THE VATICAN, THE EMBASSY, THE NATIONAL MEDIA AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS TO PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS AND FOREIGN, churches of different faiths, A supporters of Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.
OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE MEXICAN NATION AND CHAIRMAN OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY
"CUAUTITLAN IZCALLI STATE OF MEXICO,
THIRTEEN OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SIX
MINISTER MARIANO Azuela Güitrón
PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE
NATION AND THE COUNCIL OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY.
Mexico Federal District MIND:
WITH THE PURPOSE OF HEALTHY LIVING IN A GREEN-DERA MEXICO WHERE RESPECT LAW REVIEW RESPECTFULLY ASK MY ACCOUNT NEW COMPLAINTS ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES 113/2004, 313/2004, 201/2005, 223/2005, 283/2005 and 502/2005 for us to find that Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador is absolutely right in saying that the COUNCIL OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IS ONLY TO PROTECT WHITE COLLAR CRIMINALS ARE EACH OF THE DISTRICT JUDGES AND CIRCUIT JUDGES IN THESE COMPLAINTS REPORTED administrative provisions.
Mariano Azuela Guitron YOU LORD I can not argue Lopez Obrador NOR CAN SHOW THAT THE COUNCIL OF THE JUDICIARY CHAIR YOU BE RESPECTFUL OF THE PRINCIPLES of excellence, objectivity, impartiality, objectivity, professionalism and independence GOVERNING THE JUDICIAL CAREER AS ORDERED THE PARAGRAPH Seven of Article 100 of our Federal Constitution.
YOU MINISTER personal prints SIGNATURE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE 0113/2004 ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT WITH PEERS AND responsibility whatsoever DIRECTORS TO THE MEMBERS OF THE TWELFTH MAGISTRATES COURT Collegiate Administrative AFFECTING THE FEDERAL DISTRICT, DELAY and dilate the ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE PROCESSING OF INCIDENT number sentences nonperformance 15/2003 STARTED AGAINST THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF VICENTE FOX QUEZADA BE REPEATED SO DISOBEYED or contempt FIRM UNDER THE JUDGEMENT RENDERED IN MY FAVOR AT THE NUMBER UNDER TRIAL 1376/2003 BY JUDGE FIRST DISTRICT IN adminis-trative of the Federal District. THESE JUDGES DO NOT TURN THE MATTER TO THE PLENARY OF THE SUPREME COURT GAVE NOR PGR VIEW IN TIME FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST YOU, AS THEY DID THIS OTHER FEDERAL JUDGES judiciary itself against Lopez Obrador. DID NOT NOTHING MUCH JUST DECLARED AFTER THIS INCIDENT NO MATTER nonperformance ALTHOUGH DISTRICT JUDGE HAD NOT DECLARED THAT THE FAILURE HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED. MINISTER
Mariano Azuela Guitron, SEE THE DECISION ISSUED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE THEN CELEBRATED BY THE FORMER DIRECTOR AND NOW Sergio Valls Hernández NEW MINISTER TO MEET THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT NUMBER 313/2004, SEE THERE PROTECTING THE THIRD COURT JUDGES ON ADMINISTRATIVE PEER-BASED STATE Naucalpan Mexico, see Invoking THESIS OF JURISPRUDENCE REPEALED AND BASED ON ORGANIC LAW OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY PRIOR TO REPEAL THE EXISTING. MINISTER
Mariano Azuela SEE HOW THE COUNCIL OF THE JUDICIARY CHAIR YOU KNOW AND REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE IRREGULARITIES REPORTED BY MY COMPLAINT AGAINST 201/2005 JUDGES FIRST MEMBERS OF TRIBE-NAL Collegiate Administrative BASED TOLUCA STATE OF MEXICO. SEE HOW THIS
COUNCIL OF THE JUDICIARY CHAIR YOU also refused to INVESTIGATE IRREGULARIDAES REPORT IT TO THEM BY MY COMPLAINT 502/2005 COMMITTED BY THE JUDGES INVOLVED-TES THIRD PEER IN CIVIL COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT BASED IN TOLUCA MEXICO STATE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE UNDER DIRECT 042/2004, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE ALLEGED FACTS constitute a crime. SEE HOW THIS
COUNCIL OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY HAS NOT SUBMITTED ANY CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUDGES AND KNEW THAT MATTERS resove not their role as denounced in the complaints 223/2005 and 502/2005 NOR ANY ADMINISTRATIVE imposed sanctions. WHY THE FOUR JUDGES IN CIVIL COURT COLLEGIATE SECOND CIRCUIT BASED ACCEPTED TOLUCA MEXICO STATE OF KNOWLEDGE OF DISABILITY ADMINISTRA-TIVE IN, IS, OTHER MATERIAL, IF THIS WILL was up to the nearest administrative COURTS OF THE SAME CIRCUIT LOCATED in Naucalpan MEXICO STATE?, OR WHY THE JUDGES OF THE FIRST CIVIL COURT COLLEGIATE DISCOVER ACCEPTED TO A CIVIL impediments rightful KNOW THE SECOND CIVIL COURT COLLEGIATE, BOTH LOCATED IN TOLUCA MEXICO STATE? In this institution COUNCIL OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IS NOTHING THAT THE ARTICLE 132 OF THE CURRENT ORGANIC LAW OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY forces them to start DUTY DISCIPLINARY administrative procedures, OA ALTHOUGH MY COMPLAINTS ARE SUPPORTED BY IN SUCH CASES Any irregularities WHICH REPORTED DES. OF THIS OBLIGATION IS NOTHING TO ORDER:
"Article 132. The procedure to determine the responsibilities of public servants of the Judiciary of the Federation referred to in this title will start automatically for grievance or complaint by any person, public servant who has knowledge of the facts or by the agent Federal Public Ministry. Anonymous complaints will only be processed when accompanied by reliable documentary evidence.
The accusations that are made must be supported by documentary evidence or sufficient evidence to establish the existence of the breach and assumed the responsibility of the accused public servant. "
NOR ANYTHING THAT IS SECTION ELEVEN OF ARTICLE 81 OF THE ORGANIC LAW OF THE JUDICIARY OF THE FEDERATION TO ORDER:
" Article 81. The powers of the Federal Judiciary Council:
XI. Suspended from his duties at the circuit magistrates and district judges shall appear involved in the commission of a crime, and submit a complaint or lawsuit against them in cases where appropriate; "
MINISTER FOR THESE Mariano Azuela Guitron, YOU CAN NOT WHEN CONTRADICT Lopez Obrador says that "this ROTTEN political system is "saying that" THIS IS JUST JUDICIAL SYSTEM TO JUSTIFY THE SPOILS OF WEAK AGAINST STRONG, YOU CAN NOT
CONTRADICT Lopez Obrador SAYS WHEN "THE DEVIL AND ITS INSTITUTIONS, MINIS-TRO YOU LORD I can not argue Lopez Obrador when he says "THIS COUNCIL OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IS ONLY TO PROTECT white-collar criminals" AS JUDGES OF DISTRICT AND CIRCUIT JUDGES IN THESE REPORTED THAT HE administrative complaint. YOU CAN NOT CONTRADICT MINISTER'S SPEECH DELIVERED López Obrador THIS TUESDAY THE TWELFTH OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND SIX on its Web DE INTERNET.
RESPECTFULLY RIVERA JUAN MIGUEL MOLINA, MEXICAN ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE BY THE COUNCIL OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY BY THE TRIFE, EFI, THE POLITICAL PARTY AND ATTACHED PRIAN (GREEN ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP) AND THE ELECTED PRESIDENT FELIPE CALDERON HINOJOSA ALIAS "Feli PILLO RATERON "ALIAS" THE HANDS CLEAN riveramolinajm@prodigy.net.mx "
HERE TO THIS LETTER widely via email.
THIS MAIL IS ALSO POSTED ON THE SITE OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION FOR THE THEME OF JUSTICE AND SECURITY IN THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS
http://www.cnd.org.mx/Memorias/ponencias/453.pdf
For all this, what else could be expected from the Supreme Court of Justice's Office to resolve the issue of "Gober Beautiful" and Lydia Cacho?
Mexican and Mexican, I invite you to reflect on the corruption prevailing in the Federal Judiciary, has long been the PRI and the PAN has encouraged this corruption that only voting against it may remove my name is Juan Miguel Rivera Molina, studied the careers of Law degree at the Technological University Mexico, and along with my children have been victims of this corruption, so we have nine years apart, from my experience I learned that little point that I know the rights that laws give us when a judge is corrupt and is protected by other senior judges, such as the Presidents of the Supreme Court's Office and the Federal Judiciary Council, that what I have done to me and my kids do not do unto yourself, learn, before making up their duties in compliance with the articles 128 and 133 of our Federal Constitution, the judges pledged to nuetra cunplir and enforce laws and said that in the case of not doing so: "... THE NATION THE SUE ME. " Remember that.
We are entitled to a better society and a better government, let's do it together really. I hope your comments and remember that we all are enriched.
riveramolinajm@prodigy.net.mx
riveramolinajuanmiguel38@gmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment