Perfecting the ranks of game-survey results of bravery. Thrown Yes or No? Joselito By Jose Morente / Juan Medina
First . Included in the table game results, survey the bravery of the bull Cast Cuvillo Nunez. The first column defines the characters as you know the score, which is the maximum possible value that appears in the second column.
Columns E-1 to E-13 include each scores of fans participating in the survey, which we appreciate from "The disembodied reason" and "The ranks of amateur" participation in it, because the table as you have found is quite laborious.
The average column includes the results end obtained by averaging the ratings issued by all participants. For disaggregated characters as they have not been rated by some amateur "complacent" (This is relative eye. complacent are those who have not done the survey ) averages only naturally includes scores issued.
Second . Al not be large enough sample not considered self-certification of each fan as torista "or" bullfighters "and that threw no conclusive data .
Third . The level of participation has been low . However, the level of passion of the participants, many of whom we know personally, ensures reliable results.
room. With the scores issued ( 71 points out of 100 possible ), that the bull Cast "deserves the title of NOTABLE , but does not reach the upper class, making more questionable pardon.
Fifth . Regarding the overall scores worth highlighting:
• High score ( remarkably high ) that deserves presentation of this bull (8 of 10) indicative of his fine appearance and great makings . And a fact, importantly, the bull weighed 500 kg Righteous. No need for a bull elephant that has a fine appearance suitable (which refutes the canard of the bull on the supposed preference of fans for a big bull and off-type). On the contrary, Cast has been evaluated with high note in this section, by highlighting type and fineness, which has been taken into account by the participants to the survey.
• Feedback on the fate of rods has been very low (5.5 out of 10) which is an approved "scraping" which was perhaps predictable. The amateur torista or bullfighters (no matter) values \u200b\u200bhighly this way it is in a very delicate trance days, especially with the regulatory reduction in the number of Shiv that weakens as functional test of bravery , what that reduces it to mere chance of punishment and the bull's head dharma.
If it surprising contrast, the dispersion of scores indicative of dispersion criteria of each fan of judging each concept. Not all fans have the same approach (not surprisingly) when judging the behavior of the bull.
In any case, not excessive power of the bull and taking no more Shiv will penalize too.
• In flags, the score of the bull begins to climb their behavior accordingly from low to high the fighting and up to remarkably high (7.7 out of 10).
assessment also surprised some point, possibly to consider a major flaw amateur and bull's tendency to leave open that showed in the third. Defect not readily apparent because of the good deals gang, rather than the bravery of Burel.
-
Where the subject takes Flight and justified the hype fighting has brought this bull is in the crutch. Attention, because the bull is exceptional note: Outstanding (8.9 out of 100) and what their nobility and softness extreme some fans have tended to judge with some rigor . However, there have been several notes of 30 (maximum possible in the third).
Sixth . We will not enter the scores of each character as sufficient to review the Table, however, we note that some scores are isolated amazing. Possibly because of the concept representing disparity exists criteria. For example, given the behavior of the bull in the plaza are striking scores on the exit rods removed in the same fight in a third or persecution banderillero corresponding in luck.
On the contrary, it is worth noting the unanimous assessment of the softness and nobility infinite this bull, which was, we believe, what dazzled the square.
Conclusions. The survey results are coincident with the majority opinion of critics and discerning fans among those who believe that there is unanimity on the inappropriateness pardon. According to the survey, the bull dropped was (with the scales of the 60's of last century) a bull NOTABLE but not exceeding in all phases of the fight and less on luck beam.
Since RETA Article 60 provides that the President may grant clemency res to be worthy of it:
"for their husbandry characteristics and excellent performance in all phases of the fight without exception and especially in the fate of rods .
It
Cast the pardon was not only inappropriate but must qualify faulty and should not be granted, in any case, by the Chair.
different question is whether the majority public request of Sevilla (Square of acceptability) shines a change criterion in assessing the behavior of the bull, which is skills required for current deals. Or, as defined by Juan Pedro Domecq, toreabilidad "chase the bull that moves ... [which] is easier when the bull is less fierce "( From bullfighting to bravura . Alliance, p. 227). If this shift is moved to regulation would open another debate as well different, and it is possible different opinions among different bullfighting regulations, having conferred the autonomous exclusive competence in the field.
