In a season where El Juli and Manzanares seem, for now, the rival to beat, what is the ear of Fandiño in Madrid? Or that of Serafin Marin in Zaragoza? How much are the two Esau in Seville?
This blog was born three years ago with a proposal for a new scale (NET) alternative to the traditional. It was to order the slaughter on their merits in terms of 1 st and 2 nd, considering especially the wins in Madrid and Seville.
bullrings The NET distinguishes between different categories, assessing more than the trophies won in the first. But has the limitation of equal value to all the trophies cut into squares of a certain category. That is, the same one ear scores in Bilbao Cordoba another in Barcelona. And the same happens in places second, so that an ear of Logroño and Santander counts as one of Jaén.
In a previous post - Around 54 places to ring in - already ranked the English bullrings ratio based on the "ears and run." It then noted that there are lots more 2 ª demanding that other administratively classified as 1 st. This ratio can be used to build a fairer scale, to weigh accurately and singular the trophies won at each fair.
its application in the current season. The ladder case until May 8 is as follows:
then presents the results of the ten places 1st and 2nd where there have been bull bulls until May 8:
A less rigorous Square and therefore a higher ratio ear / run "is assigned the value of an ear cut off point there. So far it has been Arnedo, with 8 ears in an afternoon.
trophies achieved in other places have a value of 8 divided by its respective ratio ear / run. " For example, in Valencia has been cut an average of 2 ears of late, so that every trophy there would be worth 4 times that of Arnett. Is assigned a value of 4 points.
With this approach, the scale of slaughter would be headed by El Juli, followed closely by Jose'M ª Manzanares. In third position would be located Fandiño Ivan, and after him Serafin Marin, El Cid Fernández and Esau .
FINAL SKIRMISH
A ladder is not determines who he fights better, like not always the champions league is the team that played better. The champion is the club that has won more points, according to the criteria set in advance. If you change the criteria, another could be the end result. What if the points made outside the home are twice? Or if valiesen penalty goals scored in half?
The same applies to the ranks of bullfighting. According to the criteria established, and management will be final. Of course, for the method of calculation is operational, the merits to be included must be measurable and comparable.
In this post I wanted to stop and reflect on the possibility of getting closer to an ideal ranking . At first glance, the organization has been obtained with the new hypothesis seems a good reference of the sensations that so far, offers the season.
As a famous economist, Milton Friedman , what matters the assumptions behind the theory is "their predictive power on the types of events that aims to explain ... The only relevant test of the validity of a hypothesis is comparison of its predictions with experience. "( The methodology of positive economics )
One drawback .- As raised, this scale is much more laborious than the NET, because you have to check each matador cropped at each fair. The result of much work worth it?
A qualification .- As time elapses and go matadors accumulating points should be overweight Madrid and Sevilla if you want to continue emphasizing the impact of the triumphs achieved in these two arenas.
0 comments:
Post a Comment